Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Board of Education, Union Free School District No. 7 & Heckler Electric Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meyer, J.

Motion for stay of arbitration granted. Respondent is an electrical contractor seeking to recover for damages (1) resulting from delays arising from acts of the board and of other contractors and failure of the board to co-ordinate the work of the several contractors and (2) for specified extras. An earlier demand for arbitration setting forth the same claims has been stayed as a result of the Appellate Divi*1031sion’s decision (8 A D 2d 940) (a) that section 3813 of the Education Law formed part of the contract and that, therefore, respondent was obligated by the provisions of that section to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Todd v. Board of Education of the City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Schlatter v. Town of HempsteadNew York Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Arbitration Between Board of Education & Heckler Electric Co.New York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API