Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration Between Board of Education & Heckler Electric Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1960Published

1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meyer, J.

In the Daedalian ■ labyrinth of “ contract documents ” that constitutes the agreement between petitioner and respondent lurks a contractual monstrosity equally as fabulous as the mythological Minotaur — the arbitration provisions of that agreement. Petitioner school board entered into an agreement with respondent, an electrical contractor, for the electrical work on 17 buildings constituting new junior and senior high schools. The contract documents include Drawings and Specifications, Notice to Contractors, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Contract, General Conditions Governing All…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thomann v. City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Matter of Delmar Box Co.(ætna Ins. Co.)New York Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. McMahon v. . the New York and Erie Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  4. Todd v. Board of Education of the City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Garr v. GomezCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1832

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API