Legal Opinion

Satti v. Fine, 95-4199 (1996)

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Decided February 13, 1996No. C.A. PC 95-4199Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

The matter presently before this Court is plaintiffs' appeal from a July 21, 1995 decision of the City of Pawtucket Zoning Board of Review (Board). Jurisdiction in this Superior Court is pursuant to G.L. 1956 (1991 Reenactment) § 45-24-20.

I. Case and Travel

Plaintiffs Rudolph Holewa (Holewa) and Sadie Handrigan (Handrigan) are owners of the property in question. The property consists of one lot located on Pawtucket Tax Assessor's Plat 30, Lot No. 175, on Brookdale Boulevard in Pawtucket. This lot is located in a Residential single-family zone (RS).

Plaintiff David W. Satti, Inc. (Satti)…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Washington Ex Rel. Seattle Title Trust Co. v. RobergeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Viti v. Zoning Board of Review of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1960
  4. Westminster Corp. v. Zoning Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
  5. Gott v. NorbergSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API