Legal Opinion

Seip v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 4, 2003No. 1543, Sept. Term, 2002PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADKINS, Judge.

We are asked to decide whether the suppression court erred in holding that a police officer in fresh pursuit of a motorist who violated the speed limit within the officer’s jurisdiction may stop that motorist outside the officer’s jurisdiction. We affirm the suppression court’s holding because we find no error in its findings that the doctrine of fresh pursuit is not abrogated by Md.Code (1957, 2001 Repl.Vol.), section 2-102(b)(3) of the Criminal Procedure Article (“CP”).

FACTS AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

At approximately 1:30 AM on February 27, 2001, Earl Warren Seip, III, appellant,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stevenson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  2. Dashiell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. Blitz v. Beth Isaac Adas Israel CongregationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  4. Gattus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  5. State v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. AtwellDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2007
  2. (2004), Maryland Attorney General Reports2004
  3. 89 Op. Att'y Gen. 153 (2004), Maryland Attorney General Reports2004
  4. Maryland Attorney General Opinion 99OAG050, Maryland Attorney General Reports2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API