Legal Opinion

United States v. Layman

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 21, 2005No. 04-17212; D.C. No. CV-04-00307-LKK/KJMPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM**

Zeke Layman and Darline Koff appeal pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the United States, directing foreclosure of liens imposed with respect to unpaid federal income tax liabilities. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Feiler v. United States, 62 F.3d 315, 316 (9th Cir.1995), and we affirm.

The underlying tax assessments were reduced to a judgment in a separate proceeding, which Layman and Koff do not contest. The district court properly rejected Layman and Koffs contention that under the pertinent statute of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Home State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States v. James A. Overman, Marie T. Overman, Circle J. Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  3. Feiler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. BJ Rentals, LLC v. BuckDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2023
  2. United States v. SprengerDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
  3. United States v. WardleDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API