Legal Opinion

United States v. Sprenger

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided August 4, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00026Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 United States of America, No. CV-20-00026-PHX-MTL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Dennis J Sprenger, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiff the United States of America (the “United States”) moves for default 16 judgment against Defendants Dennis J. Sprenger and Bank of Arizona pursuant to Fed. R. 17 Civ. P. 55(b)(2). (Doc. 23.) All Defendants have been timely served. (Docs. 7, 9, 10, 28.) 18 Sprenger and Bank of Arizona have not appeared or filed any responses. For the reasons 19 discussed below, the Motion for…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API