Legal Opinion
In Re Sealed Case 00-5116
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 3, 2001No. 00-5116 and 00-5302PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE.
SENTELLE, Circuit Judge:
In In re Sealed Case, we held that the Federal Election Commission (FEC) unquestionably violated its authorizing statute and its own regulations by placing information about an ongoing investigation in the public record as part of a subpoena enforcement action. 237 F.3d 657, 667 (D.C.Cir.2001). Now, Appellants in that case apply for fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Appellants argue that they are entitled to attorney fees exceeding the $125 per hour typically provided…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Masonry Masters, Inc. And Rigoberto Perdomo v. Alan C. Nelson and Janet Reno, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Love v. ReillyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- F.J. Vollmer Company, Inc. v. John W. Magaw, Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms, U.S. Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Denver S. Cooper v. United States Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Jayne Mathews-Sheets v. Michael AstCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Healey v. LeavittCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Healey v. LeavittCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Caplash v. NielsenDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2018
- Scarborough v. NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.