Cummins v. Line
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Caddo County; C. Ross Hume, Judge. Action by C. E. Cummins against Sherman Tine. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtLoofbourrow, J.
The pleadings and evidence in this case show that one G. W. Station held a lease on certain Caddo Indian lands in Caddo county; that he attempted to assign such lease to one H. B. Siens; that as a consideration for such transfer Siens executed a negotiable promissory note, payable to G. W. Station, in the sum of .$300; that the plaintiff, Cummins, and defendant, Line, signed said note as sureties; that the note was transferred in due course to the Oklahoma State Bank of Chickasha; that some six or eight months after the execution and delivery of the note plaintiff, Cummins, learned that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fletcher v. JacksonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1851
- Strickler v. GitchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- McClure v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
- Cave ex rel. Wallace v. BurnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1844
- Faurot v. GatesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by3 opinions
- Winans v. HareSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Frank v. NATIONAL PRINTING AND OFFICE SUPPLY CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Pendergraft v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916