Legal Opinion

Smetanka v. Borough of Ambridge, Pennsylvania

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 9, 1974No. Civ. A. 73-518PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF COURT

MARSH, Chief Judge.

In this action a preliminary injunction was granted on November 28, 1973, in favor of the plaintiff, Elizabeth Smetanka, restraining the defendant Councilmen from refusing to permit her to speak during the citizens’ portion of Council meetings open to the public. The defendants have complied with the preliminary injunction. The action of Alice Ciberey and Coneetta M. Fosnaught, plaintiffs, for preliminary injunction and damages was denied pend ing final hearing. The final hearing was held in March, 1974. The evidence…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. V. Stevens Kite v. Clarence M. Kelley, Director, Federal Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
  2. Turpin v. MailetCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  3. Jones v. McElroyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Domingo Roque Molina v. Paul T. Richardson and the City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  5. Owen v. City of IndependenceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API