Legal Opinion

In the Interest of G.F.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 13, 2009No. ED 90104PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, Judge.

In this proceeding for an order of child protection, we must decide two novel issues relative to exemptions sought by a petitioner under Section 455.504.2 of the Child Protection Orders Act. We must determine whether the statute exempts a petitioner, first, from payment of the appellate court docket fee and, secondly, from payment of guardian ad litem fees. Because we hold that the appellate court docket fee is a “filing fee” and the guardian ad litem fees are “court costs,” as those terms are used in the statute, we conclude that a petitioner is exempt from paying…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bosworth v. SewellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  2. Gash v. Lafayette CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  3. State Ex Rel. Burns v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  4. United Pharmacal Co. of Missouri, Inc. v. Missouri Board of PharmacySupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  5. Finnegan v. Old Republic Title Co. of St. Louis, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Grubbs v. Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury FundMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Gasconade County Counseling Services, Inc. v. Missouri Department of Mental HealthMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Opinion No. (2011), Missouri Attorney General Reports2011
  4. S.N.L. v. A.B.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API