Legal Opinion

Trico Products Corp. v. E. A. Laboratories, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided April 24, 1931No. 5411PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYERS, District Judge.

This is a motion by the plaintiff in a patent cause to strike paragraphs 3 to 8, inr.lu*405sive, of the answer; said paragraphs being captioned “As a Counterclaim and Defense.”

Upon the hearing, the defendant consented that paragraph 8 be stricken, and that so much of the motion as was directed to the description of these several paragraphs as a counterclaim was consented to. It remains, therefore, to consider whether the motion should be granted as to paragraphs 3 to 7, inclusive, as a defense.

The bill of complaint is in conventional form and, in addition to formal…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Trice v. ComstockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  2. Bentley v. TibbalsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
  3. Talbot v. Independent Order of OwlsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  4. Langley v. DevlinWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Virtue v. Creamery Package Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. American Bowling & Billiard Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942
  2. Radio Corporation v. Duovac Radio Tube CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1931
  3. Wisconsin Foundation Research Foundation v. Vitamin Technologists, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API