Trico Products Corp. v. E. A. Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
BYERS, District Judge.
This is a motion by the plaintiff in a patent cause to strike paragraphs 3 to 8, inr.lu*405sive, of the answer; said paragraphs being captioned “As a Counterclaim and Defense.”
Upon the hearing, the defendant consented that paragraph 8 be stricken, and that so much of the motion as was directed to the description of these several paragraphs as a counterclaim was consented to. It remains, therefore, to consider whether the motion should be granted as to paragraphs 3 to 7, inclusive, as a defense.
The bill of complaint is in conventional form and, in addition to formal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Trice v. ComstockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Bentley v. TibbalsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
- Talbot v. Independent Order of OwlsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
- Langley v. DevlinWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Virtue v. Creamery Package Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. American Bowling & Billiard Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942
- Radio Corporation v. Duovac Radio Tube CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1931
- Wisconsin Foundation Research Foundation v. Vitamin Technologists, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1941