Legal Opinion
David McCorkle v. Bank of America Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided July 25, 2012No. 11-1668PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge AGEE wrote the opinion, in which Judge DAVIS and Judge WYNN joined.
OPINION
AGEE, Circuit Judge:
David McCorkle and William Pender (“Plaintiffs”) appeal the district court’s order dismissing two of their class action claims against Bank of America Corp. (“the Bank”) for alleged violations of certain provisions of the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461. The gravamen of Plaintiffs’ claims is that the Bank of America Pension Plan (“the Plan”) employed a normal retirement age (“NRA”) that violated ERISA in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- CIGNA Corp. v. AmaraSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Vitol, S.A. v. Primerose Shipping Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Williams Hicks v. Pga Tour, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- William Pender v. Bank of America CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Total Realty Management, LLC v. R. A. North Development, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Laurent v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.