Legal Opinion
Best Foods, Inc. v. General Mills, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 2, 1945No. 321PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, District Judge.
1. A considerable portion of defendant’s reargument was directed against plaintiffs’ right to sue because of an absence of a sufficient property right. To support this conclusion defendant relies upon the Delaware cases of Coca-Cola Co. v. Nehi Corporation, Del., 36 A.2d 156; Standard Oilshares, Inc. v. Standard Oil Group, Inc., 17 Del.Ch. 113, 150 A. 174; American Radio Stores, Inc. v. American Radio & Television Stores Corporation, 17 Del.Ch. 127, 150 A. 180. Plaintiffs’ right to sue and whether defendant’s conduct constitutes unfair competition must be an swered by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Coca-Cola Co. v. Koke Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Standard Oilshares, Inc. v. Standard Oil Group, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1930
- Gum, Inc. v. Gumakers of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- American Radio Stores, Inc. v. American Radio & Television Stores Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Taussig v. Wellington Fund, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1960
- Sender v. MannDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2006
- United States Ex Rel. Rodriquez v. Weekly Publications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947
- Lopez v. Resort Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Du Pont Safety Razor Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.