Legal Opinion

Ward v. Packard

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1861PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Fifth District. For facts see opinion. Plaintiff had judgment for the amount of the note. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCope, J.

Field, C. J. concurring.

This is an action upon a promissory note for eight hundred dollars. The defenses relied upon are fraud and failure of consideration, but we do not find in the record any foundation for these defenses. The note was given in consideration of the assignment of a certificate of purchase issued under a statute of this State, providing for the sale and reclamation of the swamp and overflowed lands. The alleged fraud rests upon the fact, that the plaintiff failed to inform the defendants of the existence of a judgment, which it is claimed constituted an incumbrance upon the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tullis v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Oldenburg v. BrodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API