Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Thomas Flexible Coupling Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 1945No. Appeal, 178PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Horace Stern,

Because of a decision of the Tax Court of the United States in passing upon the liability of the defendant company for income and excess profit taxes for the years 1939, 1940 and 1941, a question arose between plaintiff and defendant as to whether certain contracts between them were invalid for want of consideration. Accordingly they joined in asking the Court of Common Pleas of Warren County, where the company’s plant is situated, for a declaratory judgment in order to resolve that doubt.

Bertha E. Thomas, plaintiff, owned a certain basic patent for flexible…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hillcrest Foundation, Inc. v. McFeatersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Magazine Digest Publishing Co. v. ShadeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Merchants-Citizens National Bank v. MauserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Shaffer v. Scharding Et UxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Institute for Scientific Information, Inc. v. Gordon and Breach, Science Publishers, Inc. Scientific Technical Book Service, LtdCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  2. Greene v. Oliver Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Krosnar v. Schmidt Krosnar McNaughton Garrett Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Nova Chemicals, Inc. v. Sekisui Plastics Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  5. University Patents, Inc. v. KligmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API