Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Hudson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 12, 1990No. 89-559PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a petition for writ of mandamus filed by Deborah Hooks Hudson, seeking a review de novo1 pursuant to Rule 21(e)(1), A.R.App.P., which provides, in pertinent part, as follows:

"A decision of a court of appeals on an original petition for writ of mandamus . . . may be reviewed de novo in the Supreme Court, and an application for rehearing in the Court of Appeals is not a prerequisite for such review. If an original petition for extraordinary relief has been denied by the Court of Appeals, review may be had by filing a similar petition in the Supreme Court (and, in such a case, in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Army Aviation Ctr. Fed. Cred. UnionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Ex Parte CSX Transp., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  3. Ex Parte FrenchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Hudson v. HudsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Parker v. City of TuscaloosaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  2. Ex Parte LeigeberCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  3. Barr v. Jefferson County Barber CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2017
  4. State ex rel. J.Z. v. J.S.T.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  5. Nicholson v. MoatesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API