Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Hudson
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided April 12, 1990No. 89-559PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This is a petition for writ of mandamus filed by Deborah Hooks Hudson, seeking a review de novo1 pursuant to Rule 21(e)(1), A.R.App.P., which provides, in pertinent part, as follows:
"A decision of a court of appeals on an original petition for writ of mandamus . . . may be reviewed de novo in the Supreme Court, and an application for rehearing in the Court of Appeals is not a prerequisite for such review. If an original petition for extraordinary relief has been denied by the Court of Appeals, review may be had by filing a similar petition in the Supreme Court (and, in such a case, in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ex Parte Army Aviation Ctr. Fed. Cred. UnionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Ex Parte CSX Transp., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987
- Ex Parte FrenchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Hudson v. HudsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990
3Cited by7 opinions
- Parker v. City of TuscaloosaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
- Ex Parte LeigeberCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
- Barr v. Jefferson County Barber CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2017
- State ex rel. J.Z. v. J.S.T.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
- Nicholson v. MoatesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.