Legal Opinion

Jagnandan v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 25, 1989No. 316-88CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NETTESHEIM, Judge.

This case is before the court after argument and supplemental briefing on defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to RUSCC 12(b)(1) for failure to state a claim within this court’s subject matter jurisdiction.

FACTS

The following facts are drawn from the administrative record. Norris R. Jagnan-dan, M.D. (“plaintiff”), while a medical student participated in the Armed Forces Health Professions Scholarship Program, which required that upon graduation he serve a four-year commitment on active duty as a member of the United States Army Reserve. Plaintiff was awarded his…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  5. Austin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Todd A. Dock, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  2. Reed v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  3. Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  4. Knight v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  5. Gove v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API