Gluck v. Reuben Rose & Co.
Civil Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the CourtLouis I. Kaplan, J.
Defendant Reuben Rose & Co. Inc. moves to dismiss the complaint herein upon the ground that it fails to state a cause of action, and secondly, upon the ground *34that, the alleged cause of action is barred by the three-year Statute of Limitations.
Plaintiff claims that the corporate defendant committed a breach of contract and that the six-year Statute of Limitations applies.
The corporate defendant, a stockbrokerage firm and its customers’ man, Norman Block, were served with process herein. However, the third-named defendant Arnold Miller, a ‘ ‘ puts ’ ’, “ calls ” and “ straddles ” dealer, was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Craig v. PierceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Crusius v. LouchheimNew York Supreme Court · 1928
- Grace v. LivingstoneDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1961