Legal Opinion

Gluck v. Reuben Rose & Co.

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided January 22, 1968PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLouis I. Kaplan, J.

Defendant Reuben Rose & Co. Inc. moves to dismiss the complaint herein upon the ground that it fails to state a cause of action, and secondly, upon the ground *34that, the alleged cause of action is barred by the three-year Statute of Limitations.

Plaintiff claims that the corporate defendant committed a breach of contract and that the six-year Statute of Limitations applies.

The corporate defendant, a stockbrokerage firm and its customers’ man, Norman Block, were served with process herein. However, the third-named defendant Arnold Miller, a ‘ ‘ puts ’ ’, “ calls ” and “ straddles ” dealer, was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Craig v. PierceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  2. Crusius v. LouchheimNew York Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Grace v. LivingstoneDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1961

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. Hoover, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Franklin County1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API