Legal Opinion

Crusius v. Louchheim

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCotillo, J.

Plaintiff in an action against a firm of stockbrokers asks for summary judgment and judgment on the pleadings. The essential point at issue centers about the legal effect of a transaction in which defendants represented the plaintiff in dealing with another broker. The facts in brief are that the plaintiff opened and conducted a margin account with the defendants for the purchase and sale of securities. No question is raised with respect to any of the transactions in that account, except the matter arising out of an option known as a “ put ” of 100 shares of Manhattan Electrical Supply…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Langley v. . Westchester Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Kent v. De CoppetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  3. Peckham v. KetchumThe Superior Court of New York City · 1860
  4. Orvis v. Wells, Fargo & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gluck v. Reuben Rose & Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1968
  2. Passman v. OliphantNew York Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Gruntal v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API