Legal Opinion

State v. Murray

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 2015No. ED 101145PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKurt S. Odenwald, Judge

Introduction

Appellant Lance Murray (“Murray”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered after a jury verdict. The jury found Murray guilty on three counts: first-degree robbery, armed criminal action, and first-degree tampering. Before trial began, Murray filed a motion to proceed pro se. The trial court granted Murray’s motion. On appeal, Murray argues that the trial court erred in granting his motion to proceed pro se. Because Murray made a timely, unequivocal, knowing, and intelligent waiver of his right to counsel, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Factual and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Indiana v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. United States v. Wilbert Brown, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  4. State v. FasseroSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  5. United States of America v. Darrell Theodore Kind, Also Known as Troy SwanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State of Missouri v. Tawanda KunongaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. State of Missouri v. Gabriel L. LeonardMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. State v. BoldenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. State of Missouri v. Ronald DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Murray v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API