Legal Opinion

State v. Bolden

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 2016No. ED 102965PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., Judge

This case presents the issue of whether a trial court may constitutionally allow an unrepresented defendant to waive his right to counsel when the trial court at the same time has reason to doubt the defendant's competency to stand trial and has not yet resolved that issue. We conclude a trial court cannot.

Darrell I. Bolden (Defendant) appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction of two counts of first-degree robbery and two counts of armed criminal action. His primary argument concerns the trial court's decision to allow him to proceed pro se in this case. We…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BoldenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Darnell Hollings v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. Darrell I. Bolden v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Pete Wright v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. Leroy W. Coleman, Jr. v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API