Legal Opinion

Parker v. Solis Mammography

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 20, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2023-0656Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ___________________________________ ) CANDICE LORRAINE PARKER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 1:23-cv-0656 (RC) ) SOLIS MAMMOGRAPHY, ) ) Defendant.1 ) ___________________________________ ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (ECF No. 18). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS the motion. I. LEGAL STANDARD Defendant moves to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), arguing that the complaint, as amended, fails to state…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API