Legal Opinion

University of Houston v. Barth

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided October 13, 2008No. 01-06-00490-CVPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*609OPINION

LAURA CARTER HIGLEY, Justice.

The University of Houston (“the University”) appeals a judgment rendered pursuant to a jury’s verdict finding that the University violated the Texas Whistleblower Act1 (“the whistleblower act”) by retaliating against Stephen Barth, a tenured professor at the University’s Conrad N. Hilton College of Hotel Management, after he reported to university officials that the college’s dean had violated the law. Barth was awarded actual damages and attorney’s fees against the University based on its violation of the whistleblower act.

Of the six issues raised by the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Walling v. MetcalfeTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Thomas v. LongTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  5. City of Fort Worth v. ZimlichTexas Supreme Court · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. University of Houston v. Stephen BarthTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Elijah Ragira/Vip Lodging Group, Inc. v. Vip Lodging Group, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2009
  3. Galveston Independent School District v. Jaco, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
  4. University of Houston v. BarthTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  5. University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API