Legal Opinion

Guzzetta v. Carey

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1957PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge M. Fartelli, J.

This is an article 78 proceeding in the nature of mandamus wherein petitioner, an attorney, seeks an order directing respondents, who are respectively the Comptroller and Mayor of the City of Mount Vernon, to audit and allow his claim for legal services rendered and disbursements incurred at the request of the Common Council of said city, and to sign and deliver checks therefor.

Respondents did not serve an answer to the petition as provided in section 1291 of the Civil Practice Act. Instead, as was their right under section 1293 of the Civil Practice Act, they cross-moved for an order…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matter of Schwab v. McElligottNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Felice v. SwezeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  3. Judson v. City of Niagara FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  4. Judson v. . City of Niagara FallsNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Mapes v. SwezeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gellis v. ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Krahmer v. McClaffertySuperior Court of Delaware · 1971
  3. Guzetta v. CareyNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Hyatt v. HultsNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Balon v. HowardNew York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API