Legal Opinion

Caruth v. Richeson

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1888PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Gity Girouit Court. — Hon. A. M. Thayer, Judge. The plaintiff was entitled to a verdict upon the pleadings and evidence. The verdict against him should have been set aside as against the evidence and the law as declared by the court. Lionberger v. Pohlman, 16 Mo.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis Gity Girouit Court. — Hon. A. M. Thayer, Judge. The plaintiff was entitled to a verdict upon the pleadings and evidence. The verdict against him should have been set aside as against the evidence and the law as declared by the court. Lionberger v. Pohlman, 16 Mo. App. 392; Whitsett v. Pans on, 79 Mo. 258; Bpohn v. Railroad, 87 Mo. 74 ; Garrett v. Greenwell, 92 Mo. 120. (1) Whether the matter complained of in the petition as libelous was (as therein also alleged) published by defendants of and concerning the plaintiff Caruth, was a material issue of fact under the…

1Opinion of the Court

Black:, J.

Plaintiff sued for fifty thousand dollars damages in an action of libel; and appealed from a judgment in favor of defendants.

The defendants, twelve in number, were sworn as grand jurors at the October term 1883 of the St. Louis criminal court. The judge .in his charge, among other things, read to them a report made by the grand jury at the previous July term, in which it is stated that there existed in St. Louis a well-organized “ring” in the interest of professional gamblers and lottery dealers; and they were instructed to give the matter a thorough investigation. The grand jurors…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Spohn v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  2. Whitsett v. RansomSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  3. Garrett v. GreenwellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  4. Doering v. SaumSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  5. St. Louis Type Foundry v. McCannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Julian v. Kansas City Star Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  2. May v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  3. O'Regan v. SchermerhornSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1946
  4. Connole v. East St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  5. Goldsborough v. Orem & JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API