Legal Opinion

McLaughlin v. McLaughlin

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 28, 1919PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On petition for divorce. On motion to dismiss petition nunc pro tunc.

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, Chancellor.

On October 28th, 1916, the petition in this canso was filed. It charged the defendant with having deserted the petitioner in September, 1912, ever since which time, and for more than two years then last past, the defendant had willfully, continuedlv and obstinately deserted the petitioner. The defendant being served with citation and certified copy of the petition, filed an answer on December 21st. 1916, in which he denied-the desertion charged. On December 23d, 1916, on motion of petitioner’s solicitor, and by convent of the solicitor of defendant, this cause *323was referred…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rudin v. RudinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
  2. McKee v. McKeeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  3. Wood v. WoodNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
  4. Jacobs v. JacobsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  5. Cook v. CookNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API