Legal Opinion
Joe Rabun, Cross-Appellee v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided June 18, 1982No. 81-7452PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FAY, Circuit Judge:
The appellant, Joe Rabun, seeks to overturn the court’s entry of a partial judgment notwithstanding the verdict and conditional grant of a new trial, following the jury’s award of $60,000.00 in compensatory damages regarding Rabun’s dual claims under Georgia law of breach of contract and malicious interference with contractual relations. We conclude that the evidence introduced at trial, viewed according to the standards applicable in considering motions for a judgment n. o. v. and a new trial, supports the jury’s verdict. Determining, reluctantly, that the trial judge…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Samuel Simblest v. Joseph MaynardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Marsh v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
- Luke v. DuPreeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Alexander v. Fulton CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Burger King Corp. v. MasonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Michael J. OLMSTED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TACO BELL CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Richard Williams v. The City of ValdostaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Popham v. City of KennesawCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.