Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Forte

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 4, 1996PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, C.J.

Each defendant successfully moved on double jeopardy grounds to dismiss indictments charging him with assault or assault and battery against a prison correction officer (and, in one case, assault with intent to murder). Each defendant argued that he had already been sentenced to disciplinary segregation pursuant to prison disciplinary procedures for the same allegedly wrongful conduct on which the indictments were based. A Superior Court judge allowed the motion of the defendant Forte, filing a memorandum of decision, and subsequently he allowed the motions of the other defendants by…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AmiraultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Ford v. BenderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  3. Taygeta Corp. v. Varian Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  4. People v. VasquezNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Doe v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API