In Re General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Gila River System
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RYAN, Justice.
I
A
¶ 1 This case arises from the ongoing adjudication of rights to the use of Gila River water and the impact of recent federal legislation facilitating the resolution of tribal water claims subject to the adjudication. 1
II2 In 2004, Congress passed the Arizona Water Settlements Act (“AWSA”), Pub.L. No. 108-451,118 Stat. 8478 (2004). Title III of the AWSA authorizes the settlement of the federal water rights claims of the Tohono O’odham Nation (“Nation”). 2 Under the auspices of the AWSA, the Nation, the United States, the City of Tucson, Farmers Investment Company…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Local Number 93, International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Martin v. WilksSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Arizona v. San Carlos Apache Tribe of Ariz.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Gila River System & SourceArizona Supreme Court · 2010
- Davis v. Agua Sierra Resources, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Ak-Chin Indian Community v. Maricopa-Stanfield Irrigation & Drainage DistrictDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- In Re: Gila River SystemArizona Supreme Court · 2010