Legal Opinion

In re Hill

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 19, 1996No. 75,283PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an original disciplinary proceeding filed by the Office of the Disciplinary Administrator against Charles E. Hill, arising from his failure to prevent the statute of limitations from running on various medical malpractice claims of his clients. At the hearing on the complaint (case No. B5916), the Disciplinary Administrator recommended to the hearing panel of the Kansas Board for Discipline of Attorneys (Board) that Hill’s license to practice law be suspended for 2 years while Hill is probated under certain terms of supervision proposed by Hill’s counsel. The panel did not adopt…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re CarsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  2. State v. ZeiglerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  3. State v. KlassenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  4. In Re BettsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  5. In Re JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re WarnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  2. In re AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  3. In Re WarnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  4. In re HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API