Legal Opinion

In Re Warner

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 27, 2000No. 84,430Published

1Opinion of the Court

270 Kan. 119 (2000)

11 P.3d 1160

In the Matter of ALAN G. WARNER, Respondent.

No. 84,430.

Supreme Court of Kansas.

Opinion filed October 27, 2000.

Frank D. Diehl, deputy disciplinary administrator, was on the formal complaint for petitioner.

Joseph P. Huerter, of The Law Firm of Tenopir and Huerter, of Topeka, argued the cause and was on the brief for respondent. Alan G. Warner, respondent, argued the cause pro se.

2Per curiam

This is an original proceeding in discipline filed by the office of the Disciplinary Administrator against Alan G. Warner, an attorney who has been admitted to practice law in Kansas.…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re CarsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  2. State v. ZeiglerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  3. State v. KlassenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  4. In Re FarmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  5. In Re KeithleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API