Legal Opinion

Wilhelm v. Lake

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1981No. 5386PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

Appellants, plaintiffs below, appeal from a jury verdict denying recovery based upon alleged false and fraudulent representations made to them at the time they purchased defendants-appellees’ ranch. Appellants assert that the disposition below should be reversed for the following reasons:

I.Appellants were not afforded reasonable opportunity to cross-examine ranchers called by appellees, as expert witnesses, to testify that in their opinion the ranch was suitable for a cow-calf operation.

II.The court erred in admitting testimony relating to the character and reputation of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chrysler Corp. v. TodorovichWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Nimmo v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Edwards v. HarrisWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Combined Insurance Co. of America v. SinclairWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Douglas Reservoirs Water Users Ass'n v. CrossWyoming Supreme Court · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. DonahueWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Jill Lubing v. David Tomlinson, M.D. and Grand Anesthesiology Services, P.C.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. DonahueWyoming Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API