Wilhelm v. Lake
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Justice.
Appellants, plaintiffs below, appeal from a jury verdict denying recovery based upon alleged false and fraudulent representations made to them at the time they purchased defendants-appellees’ ranch. Appellants assert that the disposition below should be reversed for the following reasons:
I.Appellants were not afforded reasonable opportunity to cross-examine ranchers called by appellees, as expert witnesses, to testify that in their opinion the ranch was suitable for a cow-calf operation.
II.The court erred in admitting testimony relating to the character and reputation of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chrysler Corp. v. TodorovichWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Nimmo v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Edwards v. HarrisWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
- Combined Insurance Co. of America v. SinclairWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Douglas Reservoirs Water Users Ass'n v. CrossWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. DonahueWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- Jill Lubing v. David Tomlinson, M.D. and Grand Anesthesiology Services, P.C.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2020
- Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. DonahueWyoming Supreme Court · 1983