Legal Opinion

De Wilde v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 9, 1955No. 59420; protest 221926-K (San Francisco)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

The merchandise the classification of which is involved in this suit was classified by the collector as “Vices, classified as hand tools,” under paragraph 396 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and duty levied thereon at the rate of 45 percent ad valorem. Plaintiffs claim said merchandise to be properly dutiable at 15 percent ad valorem under paragraph 372 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T. D. 51802, as machines, not specially provided for, “Other,” or at the rate of 22% percent ad valorem under paragraph 397 of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Simon, Buhler & Baumann (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  2. A. Pines & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Astra Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Hollywood Accessories, Division of Allen Electronics & Equip. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  3. General Chain & Belt Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  4. F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  5. Western Oilfields Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API