Legal Opinion

Ottesen v. Food Services of America, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 24, 2006No. 32740-6-IIPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

Penoyar, J.

— Food Services of America (FSA) and Darrell Corgatelli appeal the grant of summary judgment in favor of Carla Ottesen, widow of deceased Bernard Ottesen, asserting that her claims are barred by the exclusive remedy provision of Washington’s Industrial Insurance Act (IIA), Title 51 RCW. Ottesen contends that her suit falls within the “parking area” exception of the IIA because the staging yard where Ottesen was injured was a “mixed-use” area, Ottesen was not performing work-related duties, and, as to him, the yard was a parking lot. Because the uncontradicted evidence was that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Vallandigham v. Clover Park School District No. 400Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Vallandigham v. CLOVER PARK SCHOOL DIST.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Stertz v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1916

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dillon v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  2. Ottesen v. Food Services of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API