Potocnik v. Potocnik

OPINION CRIPPEN, Judge.

The future support obligation of Joseph Stephen Potocnik was determined in an amended judgment two years after dissolution of the marriage of the parties. Lynn Marie Potocnik appeals, contending that a larger award is required as a matter of law. We affirm.

FACTS

The marriage of the parties was dissolved in July 1982. Custody of their one-year old daughter was placed with Lynn Marie Potocnik. Respondent Joseph Stephen Potocnik was then in his junior year in a college engineering program, and the trial court reserved a decision on child support.

In March 1982, support…