Silberstein v. Duluth News-Tribune Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action by Bernard Silberstein and another, partners as the Crowley Electric Company, against the Duluth News-Tribune Company in the municipal court of Duluth. From a judgment entered pursuant to findings by Boyle, Sp. J., in favor of plaintiffs, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
The parties hereto entered into a contract on Jan*431uary 21, 1896, whereby the plaintiff agreed to iurnish, set up, and wire for the defendant a ten horse power arc motor, with base frame, belt tightener, brushes, regulator, foundation, and oil pan, for the sum of $248. The machine was to be a secondhand one, but was guarantied to be first class, and as good as new. The plaintiffs entered upon and tendered performance of the contract on their part, but the defendant refused to let them complete it. Thereupon the plaintiffs brought this action for damages for such breach, and recovered a judgment…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- O'Connell v. Main & Tenth Streets Hotel Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Glaspie v. GlassowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Ennis v. Buckeye Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Pevey v. Schulenburg & Boeckeler Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
3Cited by6 opinions
- Swanson v. AndrusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Baessetti v. Shenango Furnace Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Willhelm Lubrication Co. v. BrattrudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- John Newton Porter Co. v. Kiewel Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Yeates v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.