Legal Opinion

State v. Knowles

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 22, 1882PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Poweshiek District Court. An information was filed before a justice of the peace charging that the defendant sold to W. Cullison intoxicating liquor. The.defendant was convicted by the justice and appealed to the District Court, where he was again convicted, and appeals to this court.

1Opinion of the Court

Seevers, Ch. J.

The trial was had before the District Court without the intervention of a jury, upon an agreed statement of facts. No objection is made to the manner the case was tried in the District Court. The principal error relied on, in substance, is that the court erred in finding the defendant guilty under the facts agreed upon. The stipulation is as follows:

“1st. The defendant is a physician and registered pharmacist, and runs and keeps a drug store at Searsboro, in said county.

i. intoxicaTING liquors: unlawful sale Ry registered pharmacist, “2d. That on or about the 18th day of May,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HollandWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  2. McBean v. SearsHarrison County Court of Common Pleas · 1900
  3. People v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API