Legal Opinion
State v. Holland
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 30, 1918No. 14201PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of tbe superior court for Skagit county, Brawley, J., entered July 3, 1916, upon a trial and conviction of violating the state-wide prohibition law.
1Opinion of the CourtEllis, C. J.
On May 15, 1916, defendant was charged with an illegal sale of grain alcohol, the accusatory part of the information being as follows:
“That at Sedro-Woolley, in said Skagit county, Washington, on or about the 25th day of February, 1916, said defendant, then and there being a registered druggist or pharmacist, did then and there, wilfully and unlawfully sell unto one C. M. Clauder, otherwise known as - Carlton, intoxicating liquors, to-wit: One-half pint of grain alcohol, and did then and there register said sale in a book kept for that purpose by placing therein the name of said purchaser,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. WhitneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- City of Seattle v. HewetsonWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Commonwealth v. StevensMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Commonwealth v. JoslinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
- State v. BadenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Washington Federal v. GentryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Washington Federal, App. v. Kendall & Nancy Gentry, Resps.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014