Legal Opinion

City of Tulsa v. Pearson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 13, 1956No. 36975PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for injuries to her body alleged to have been sustained because of the negligence of the defendant, the City of Tulsa. The trial was to a jury and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff upon which the court rendered judgment for $2,700. This was the second trial of the case. The former judgment was appealed and reversed for a new trial. City of Tulsa v. Pearson, Okl., 277 P.2d 135.

The parties are referred to herein by their trial court designation. The plaintiff was allegedly injured on January 2, 1952, while walking across an area…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Larkins-Warr Trust v. Watchorn Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  2. The Town of Norman v. TeelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
  3. City of Picher v. BarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. City of Tulsa v. PearsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  5. Town of Okemah v. LindseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cox v. SarkeysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  2. Continental Oil Company v. RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  3. Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. HaynesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  4. Hasty Messenger Service v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  5. Embry v. WeeksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API