Legal Opinion
John A. Errichetti Associates v. Boutin
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 14, 1981PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
This ease involves an application for an order under General Statutes § 52-410, 1 directing the defendant to proceed with arbitration under the terms of an agreement contained in a deed conveying certain property owned by Stuart Judd 2 to the defendant Loretta Boutin. The trial court granted the application and ordered the defendant to proceed with arbitration. This appeal followed.
Prior to 1968, Judd was the owner of land and buildings which constitute the Mattatuck Manufacturing Company, the pond which supplies the company with water for industrial use, the dam which creates the pond, land…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Frager v. Pennsylvania General InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Connecticut Union of Telephone Workers, Inc. v. Southern New England Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- City of Hartford v. American Arbitration Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Board of Education v. Bridgeport Education Assn.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Fink v. GolenbockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Nestle Waters North America, Inc. v. BollmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Levine v. Advest, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Genovese v. Gallo Wine Merchants, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.