Legal Opinion
Chesnow v. Gorelick
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 17, 1929No. Docket No. 135, Calendar No. 34,192PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.
This bill was filed to foreclose a mechanic’s lien for $9,000 oh the Savarine hotel building in the city of Detroit, Michigan.
The plaintiff, Louis J. Chesnow, is an architect. He prepared the plans and specifications used in the construction of the hotel building, and also supervised the work under contract with the owner. It is not disputed that all of the statutory requirements pertaining to the perfecting of a lien have been complied with by the plaintiff. The only question in issue is whether a superintending architect has a lien under our statute for the drawing of plans and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hughes v. TorgersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Field v. Consolidated Mineral Water Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1903
- Libbey v. TiddenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Rinn v. Electric Power Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Otto L. Spannhake, Inc. v. Mountain Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
3Cited by7 opinions
- Robert v. Clapp Co. v. FoxOhio Supreme Court · 1931
- Sullivan v. Thomas Organization, P.C.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- Caton Ridge, Inc. v. BonnettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Spartan Asphalt Paving Co. v. Grand Ledge Mobile Home ParkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Gaastra v. Bishop's Lodge Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.