Commonwealth v. Sunbury Converting Works
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Simpson,
Defendant appeals from a judgment of the court below determining the amount of its capital stock tax for 1922. The facts are undisputed and may be briefly stated as follows:
Defendant is a domestic corporation, chartered in 1896. In 1920 it purchased certain land in New Jersey, intending to construct thereon a plant ancillary to its manufacturing establishment in this State. Title was first taken in the name of defendant’s president; but, at its request, a deed was made to a New Jersey real estate company, organized for the purpose of taking title to the property,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Gloucester Ferry Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Frick v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Kirtland v. HotchkissSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Kidd v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Cream of Wheat Co. v. County of Grand ForksSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Oklahoma County v. Queen City Lodge No. 197, I. O. O. F.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Lawrence Township School District Tax CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Commonwealth v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Commonwealth v. After Six, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Parsowith v. Com., Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.