Legal Opinion

Lilienthal v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 5, 1935No. 7788PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner’s wife, Ruth H. Lilienthal, owned 4,400 shares of stock of Southern California Gas Company, a California corporation, which she acquired at a cost of $16,500, and which in 1927 she exchanged for cash in the sum of $260,609.12 and bonds of Southern California Gas Corporation, a Delaware corporation, having a par value of $339,500 and a fair market value of $312,340. The bonds were not sold or disposed of by her in 1927. In a joint return which he filed for himself and his wife, petitioner included the cash item of $260,609.12 as taxable income for 1927, but…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pinellas Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Cortland Specialty Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  3. West Texas Refining & D. Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  4. Prairie Oil & Gas Co. v. MotterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  5. C. H. Mead Coal Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. LeTulle v. ScofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Banco de Ponce v. Secretario de HaciendaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1959
  3. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. TyngCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  4. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. FreundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
  5. Averill v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API