Carreker v. Green & Milam Inc.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
■ Jenkins, Justice.
It is the general rule that “injunction will lie, at the instance of any taxpayer who has not estopped himself, to enjoin a sale of Kis property to collect an unauthorized tax.” Fulton Trading Co. v. Baggett, 161 Ga. 669 (2), 671 (131 S. E. 358); Vincent v. Poole, 181 Ga. 718, 720 (184 S. E. 269), and cit. This is true for the reason that, unless authorized by statute, “an affidavit of illegality [is not] a proper remedy to contest the illegality of an execution in the nature of a tax execution.” Goolsby v. Board of Drainage Comrs., 156 Ga. 213 (6, b) (119 S. E. 644).…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Goolsby v. Board of Drainage Commissioners of Cedar Creek Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Hicks v. Stewart Oil Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Lane v. Mayor of UnadillaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Fulton Trading Co. v. BaggettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Vincent v. PooleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. RedwineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Church of God of Union Assembly, Inc. v. City of DaltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Griffin v. Wormsloe Foundation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. RedwineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951