Austin v. McNamara
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
GADBOIS, District Judge.
Plaintiff George M. Austin, M.D. (“Dr. Austin”), is a neurosurgeon and brings this action alleging violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1, 2 (1982), and pendent state business tort claims against five individual physicians and the Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital (“Cottage Hospital”). Plaintiff’s claims arise out of the alleged conspiracy and concerted actions of the individual Defendant physicians to shut down Dr. Austin’s neurosurgery practice in Santa Barbara by having his staff privileges suspended at Cottage Hospital.
The three Motions for Summary…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
3Cited by11 opinions
- Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Fobbs v. Holy Cross Health System Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 1992
- Smith v. OUR LADY OF LAKE HOSP.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Mathews v. Lancaster General HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Walls Regional Hospital v. Altaras, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.