Legal Opinion

Rush v. Heinisch

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1953No. 33381PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

This is an action for specific performance of an alleged oral contract to convey property made between the plaintiffs and Krist Angeloff, now deceased. The defendants, among others, are the administrators of the estate and the State of Nebraska, because of the laws as to escheated estates. The trial court denied performance and dismissed plaintiffs’ petition with prejudice. Plaintiffs filed a motion for a new trial which was overruled. Plaintiffs appeal. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The plaintiffs are the sons of Ava Angeloff by a previous marriage. Plaintiffs’ mother,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Krepcik v. Interstate Transit LinesNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Cahill v. MockettNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Nemetz v. NemetzNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Nelson v. GlidewellNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Humpert v. McGavockNebraska Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Vielehr v. MaloneNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Timmerman v. TimmermanNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Lindgren v. SCHOOL DIST. OF BRIDGEPORT IN MORRILL CTY.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Petersen v. PetersenNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Moran v. MoranNebraska Supreme Court · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API