Reina v. Metropolitan Dade County
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, § 3(b)(3), Fla.Const. (1973). Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby
Discharged.
It is so ordered.
ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, DEKLE and OVERTON, JJ., concur. ERVIN, J., dissents with opinion, in which McCAIN, J., concurs.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Perez v. ZazoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Sunshine Security & Detective Agency v. Wells Fargo Armored Services Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Martin v. United SEC. Services, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Jax Liquors, Inc. v. HallDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- Manrique v. Bob's Plumbing Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.