Legal Opinion

Sunshine Security & Detective Agency v. Wells Fargo Armored Services Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 28, 1986No. 86-688PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by the defendant Sunshine Security and Detective Agency [Sunshine] from a final default judgment entered against it in the trial court. The defendant Sunshine urges that the trial court erred in entering the default judgment below because, inter alia, the original complaint, on which the default was based, wholly failed to state a cause of action against it. We entirely agree and reverse based on the following briefly stated legal analysis.

First, the law is well-settled that a default judgment may not be entered against a defendant on a complaint which wholly fails to state…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Slomowitz v. WalkerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Westerman v. Shell's City, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1972
  3. Johnson v. Gulf Life Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Weiss v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  5. Fawcett Publications, Inc. v. RandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ginsberg v. Lennar Florida HoldingsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Becerra v. Equity Imports, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. WELLS FARGO ARM. SERVS. CORP. v. Sunshine SEC. and Detective Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1991
  4. Magnificent Twelve, Inc. v. WalkerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  5. Wells Fargo Armored Services Corp. v. Sunshine Security & Detective Agency, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API