Legal Opinion

Bickelhaupt v. in Land Motor Freight

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1937No. 26606. Department TwoPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

These three actions, all of which arose out of the same automobile accident, were consolidated for trial. The defendants were Frank Boyd and the Inland Motor Freight, a corporation, of which Boyd was an employe. Boyd defaulted, and the case was submitted to the jury to assess the damages against Boyd, determine the liability of the other defendant, and, if found liable, assess like damages against it. The jury returned separate verdicts, in each of which damages were assessed against Boyd, but all of the verdicts were silent as to the motor freight.

The plaintiffs in each case moved for a new…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Doremus v. RootWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Wills v. Montfair Gas Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Godefroy v. ReillyWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. O'Brien v. American Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Andrews v. Del GuzziWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. v. StanleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  3. State v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. State v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. Buffett v. GeldhauserDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API