Legal Opinion

United States v. Roberts

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 12, 2008No. 07-30236Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Defendant Joseph A. Roberts appeals the denial of his motion to suppress and his eighty-one-month sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a)(1). We affirm the denial of the motion to suppress; however, upon agreement of the parties, we vacate Roberts’s sentence and remand for resentencing.

1. Motion to suppress

The district court denied Roberts’s motion to suppress because reasonable suspicion supported the stop of Roberts’s truck and the stop was not impermissibly prolonged. We review de novo the denial of a motion to suppress.1 United States v.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Muehler v. MenaSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. United States v. Luis Manuel Rodriguez-LaraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API